Quantcast Claremont Independent
College Media Network

Bono: Friend of Poverty, not the Poor

Charles Johnson

Last Updated: 5/1/08 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
(If anything, aid aids dictators. The money, otherwise spent on social services, usually goes to protect instable regimes via militarism. In turn, the military's growth allows the possibility of coups, which further isolate the people from their government and encourage war.)

Skikwati's sentiments echo those of NYU professor William Easterly, author of The White Man's Burden. Easterly, an economist dedicated to examining poverty, wonders to what effect our aid has gone. Out of the 2.3 trillion dollars we've invested in foreign aid to Africa, we've still achieved pitiful results: a zero growth rate and a rising infant mortality rate, for instance. What makes us any more certain that more money is the answer?

The arguments against Bono continue, but perhaps the most damning is one written by Paul Theroux, a writer famous for his books about Africa and former Peace Corps worker in Malawi. He writes in the appropriately titled, The Rock Star's Burden, about Bono's master plan:

"When Malawi's minister of education was accused of stealing millions of dollars from the education budget in 2000, and the Zambian president was charged with stealing from the treasury, and Nigeria squandered its oil wealth, what happened? The simplifiers of Africa's problems kept calling for debt relief and more aid. …Donors enable embezzlement by turning a blind eye to bad governance, rigged elections and the deeper reasons these countries are failing."

In a December 14, 2005 New York Times op-ed, Theroux writes,

"Africa has no real shortage of capable people - or even of money. The patronizing attention of donors has done violence to Africa's belief in itself, but even in the absence of responsible leadership, Africans themselves have proven how resilient they can be - something they never get credit for. Again, Ireland may be the model for an answer. After centuries of wishing themselves onto other countries, the Irish found that education, rational government, people staying put, and simple diligence could turn Ireland from an economic basket case into a prosperous nation. In a word - are you listening, Mr. Hewson? - the Irish have proved that there is something to be said for staying home."
< prev Page 4 of 5 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 12

chromeplatedmachine

allan pearson

posted 11/07/07 @ 12:30 AM PST

biased, venomous, and absolutely terrible

this writer ought to be banned if the newsmag wants to retain its integrity

Aditya Bindal

posted 11/08/07 @ 8:19 AM PST

Well, I wonder who is biased: the author who presents a logical and clear flow of arguments based on solid evidence, or the post which shouts out without any backing, purely acting on emotional basis (like our Irish friend, perhaps?)

Also, keep in mind that the author has not touched upon several other criticisms of Bono. (Continued…)

Charles Johnson

posted 11/08/07 @ 1:21 PM PST

Typical. Ban a writer? Shame on you, Mr. Pearson. Shame on you. Address the substance, if you can.

Simon Ruf

posted 12/02/07 @ 7:40 AM PST

This article is horribly bad researched. While you state that "Ireland [is] one of the poorest developed nations in the world" quite the opposite is true. (Continued…)

Charles Johnson

posted 12/06/07 @ 4:46 PM PST

Thank you, Mr. Ruf. You are quite right. After years of flawed, Socialist taxation policies, Ireland has made the right decision and moved towards fair and flat taxation. (Continued…)

Muhammad

posted 2/14/08 @ 9:03 PM PST

Why cannot someone, like Bono, choose to exercise his efforts however he sees fit. You argue that the Red Campaign has brought in less money than Bono spent developing it, but maybe the campaign is about more than money. (Continued…)

Debt relief

posted 4/15/08 @ 12:54 PM PST

Well he is a great man and he also has reasons to be considered that way. I appreciate all the efforts, there are many people who should learn for him. (Continued…)

jake Richardson

posted 5/12/08 @ 2:56 PM PST

While I agree wholeheartedly that the plans Bono makes may not be quite as economically sound as we at CMC may wish, why on earth would you criticize a man who steps out of the mold of self involved rock frontman to become, at worst, a self involved large scale philanthropist? I sat next to you all semester in Economics while you spoke with your holier-than-thou tone about what you knew to be economic truth. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Charles Johnson

posted 5/13/08 @ 8:49 PM PST

Mr. Richardson,

I think the person you wanted to send this is Charles Sprague. I am that inhuman "red head" who he debated.

I wonder if you actually read the article as I never made some of the points you are making. (Continued…)

Storm

posted 5/26/08 @ 8:05 AM PST

Maybe his plans aren't the most concrete, but he's able to raise awareness - he's motivated a bunch of high-schoolers (me included) to take a look at ourselves and how we spend our money - and I for one, think that's a good thing. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

Where do you expect Scott Brown to be in 8 years?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement